The electric vehicle (EV) segment in Pakistan is expanding rapidly, offering buyers more choices than ever before. Two of the most popular compact electric SUVs in this market are the BYD ATTO 3 and the DFSK Seres 3. Both models promise style, practicality, and zero-emission driving, but they cater to different buyer priorities. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which EV suits your needs by examining performance, range, charging, features, safety, pricing, and after-sales support.
1. BYD ATTO 3 vs DFSK Seres 3 – Specifications Comparison
| Feature | BYD ATTO 3 | DFSK Seres 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Power | 150 kW (~201 hp) | ~120 kW (~160 hp) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | ~300 Nm |
| Battery Capacity | 49.9 kWh / 60.48 kWh (Blade LFP) | 51–54 kWh (Lithium-ion or LFP, varies) |
| Range (WLTP) | 345–420 km | 400–405 km (WLTP/CLTC mix) |
| Real-World Range | 300–420 km | 260–360 km |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.9 seconds | 8.9–9.0 seconds |
| Charging (DC Fast) | 70–88 kW, 30–80% in ~25–30 min | ~30–80% in ~25–30 min |
| Safety Features | ADAS, AEB, Lane Assist, Multiple Airbags | ABS, Airbags, Basic Safety Features |
| Price (PKR) | ~9.0–9.5 million | ~8.39 million (CKD, ex-factory) |
2. Performance and Range
The BYD ATTO 3 is equipped with a more powerful motor, delivering quicker acceleration and a higher torque output. Its Blade LFP battery is recognized for durability and safety. The ATTO 3’s WLTP range spans 345–420 km, with real-world figures between 300–420 km.
The DFSK Seres 3 offers a capable motor for everyday driving and a competitive range on paper, though real-world performance averages between 260–360 km depending on conditions.
Verdict: BYD ATTO 3 leads in both performance and consistent real-world range.
READ MORE: BYD Shark PHEV vs Toyota Hilux Revo – 2025 Pickup Truck Comparison in Pakistan
3. Charging Capabilities
Both models offer similar DC fast-charging speeds, achieving 30–80% charge in approximately 25–30 minutes. AC charging times depend on the charger type and battery size. The difference in charging convenience will depend more on the availability of charging stations in your area.
Verdict: Tie — both are equally efficient in charging performance.
4. Design and Interior
The BYD ATTO 3 stands out with its modern, tech-focused cabin, highlighted by a rotating touchscreen and high-quality materials.
The DFSK Seres 3 opts for a more traditional interior layout, focusing on practicality and user-friendly controls, offering good standard equipment for its price.
Verdict: BYD ATTO 3 offers a more premium interior experience, while Seres 3 delivers value-oriented practicality.
5. Safety and Technology
The BYD ATTO 3 comes equipped with Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking.
The DFSK Seres 3 provides standard safety features such as airbags and ABS but lacks the advanced driver assistance technologies found in the ATTO 3.
Verdict: BYD ATTO 3 is the clear winner for advanced safety technology.
6. After-Sales Support in Pakistan
The DFSK Seres 3 benefits from local CKD assembly, ensuring better parts availability and a wider service network across Pakistan.
The BYD ATTO 3 is supported by Mega Motor, with an expanding after-sales network in major cities, but its coverage is still smaller compared to DFSK.
Verdict: DFSK Seres 3 wins in after-sales accessibility due to CKD local assembly.
7. Price and Value
The DFSK Seres 3 is priced from around PKR 8.39 million (ex-factory), making it more budget-friendly.
The BYD ATTO 3 ranges between PKR 9.0–9.5 million, offering stronger performance, longer range, and advanced safety features.
Verdict: Seres 3 is the better choice for budget-conscious buyers, while the ATTO 3 justifies its higher price with better performance and features.
READ MORE: Chery Tiggo 8 Pro vs Jetour Dashing – Which 7-Seater SUV Wins in 2025?
Pros and Cons
BYD ATTO 3
- Pros: Strong performance, long real-world range, advanced safety features, premium interior.
- Cons: Higher purchase price, smaller service network.
DFSK Seres 3
- Pros: Lower price, local assembly with better parts availability, practical design.
- Cons: Lower power output, fewer advanced safety features, shorter real-world range.
Final Thoughts
If you value performance, advanced technology, and long-distance range, the BYD ATTO 3 is worth the extra investment.
If your priorities are affordability, easier maintenance, and local service support, the DFSK Seres 3 offers excellent value.
Both EVs are strong contenders, but your choice should reflect your driving needs, budget, and service accessibility.
