In order to play Pakistan in a four-match T20 series before the T20 World Cup in June, England players chose to skip the IPL finals, drawing criticism from former Pakistan captain Wasim Akram.
The former bowling coach of the Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) has echoed the criticism of the move voiced by former Indian cricket players like Sunil Gavaskar and Irfan Pathan.
The legendary Pakistani player remarked, “If you cut salaries, will it affect anything if your team doesn’t win after reaching the playoffs? ” to an Indian media outlet. “Your boys leave at the last hurdle because they have to play for their country, despite all of your hard work.” It isn’t just.
Akram’s critique underscores the packed schedules between national duties and lucrative franchise tournaments. English players opting for national commitments over IPL obligations have ignited a debate in the cricket community.
Jos Buttler and Michael Vaughan have stood by the English players, asserting that representing one’s country should always come first for international cricketers. Buttler stressed the significance of gearing up for the World Cup, while Vaughan highlighted the invaluable experience gained from the T20I series against Pakistan ahead of the marquee event.
However Akram, Pathan, and Gavaskar contend that forsaking IPL playoffs undermines the efforts of franchise teams and loyal fans who have invested time and resources throughout the tournament. They argue that contractual commitments should be honored fully, particularly during crucial playoff stages.
This controversy exposes the ongoing tug-of-war between franchise leagues and international cricket, prompting questions about the future of player commitments and the delicate balancing act required to thrive on the international stage.
The first match of the four-game T20I series between England and Pakistan will kick off at Headingley, Leeds, on May 22. Subsequent matches are scheduled for Birmingham on May 25, Cardiff on May 28, and ‘The Oval’ in London on May 30.
